- Iranians holding Ashura mourning for Imam Hussein
- Third step: Iran officially informs EU of plan to expand nuclear R&D
- Iran expands nuclear R&D program: Rouhani
- Iran goes ahead in space tech, despite US sanctions: ISA
- Resistance Front undermining Israeli regime power: Top commander
- Iran: 7 crew members of detained UK ship freed
- US addiction to sanction threaten its power: Iran’s Zarif
- Dutch role in 2007 Stuxnet attack on Iran’s nuclear site under scrutiny: Iraian FM Spox.
- Iran: ‘Sustainable Security 2019’ kicks off in Caspian Sea
- Iran’s Zarif leaves Tehran for Moscow
- Shiraz University ranked 1st in liver transplantation: Iranian health official
- Japan’s Abe to meet Iran’s president to discuss easing tension in region
- Downing of US spy drone shattered war threats against Iran: Top IRGC commander
- IAEO head reports development of first ion-therapy hospital in west of Asia
- Iranian Taekwondo team wins 2019 World Cup championship
- US sanctions failed to force Iran to buckle: Report
- Crew fixing Iran oil tanker broken down in Red Sea
- As Iranians hold nerves, US seeks to scare off trade
- Leader expresses concern about Kashmir, urges India to follow fair policy toward Muslim-majority region
- Iran saffron exports down due to smuggling, government restrictions: Exporter
- Iran FM warns US against ‘serious miscalculation’ in Persian Gulf
- Iran’s resistance policy led to release of oil tanker: MP
- Iran in reverse brain drain as top students come home in rising numbers
- Iran official calls for compensation for tanker seizure
- Iran hails N Korea for standing against ‘unilateral’ US demands
- Shia Muslims celebrate Eid Al-Ghadir
- North Korea praises Iran’s anti-US struggle
- Zarif says to meet French president Friday
- Iranian court hearing case of UK oil tanker
- Over half of Japanese voters oppose joining US-led anti-Iran coalition in Persian Gulf: Poll
- IME trade ups by 21 percent in July
- Finland backs INSTEX in defiance of US
- US anti-Iran policy in high seas harms Europeans: LA Times
- Iran, China confer on Syria
- Iran, Finland share views on Persian Gulf dialogue forum: Zarif
- Iran warns US against seizure of oil tanker
- Iraq eager to benefit from Iranian Police’s experience
- Iran planning 3rd step to reduce nuclear commitments: Spokesman
- Leader grants clemency to over 1,000 Iranian inmates
- Registration for Arbaeen Pilgrimage to begin in Iran on Friday
- Iran, Iraq agree to reopen Khosravi border crossing
- Iran deplores suicide attack at Kabul wedding hall
- Iran to hold int'l hand-woven carpets expo
- Zarif meets with Iran-Kuwait Friendship Group members
- Adrian Darya oil tanker not under any sanctions, says Iran envoy
- ‘Iran to stay in nuclear deal as long as its interests are met’
- India envoy happy with positive trend of trade with Iran
- Iran’s annual export of white meat tops 2.5m tons: Minister
- Iranian scientist discovers new state of matter
- Iran, Japan diplomats discuss bilateral ties
- Iran, Ansarullah, European representatives Yemen developments
- ‘Iran to become self-sufficient in producing aircraft engines'
- US issues seizure warrant for Iranian supertanker 'Grace 1'
- Neanderthal tooth unearthed near Iran’s Zagros mountain
- Iran’s Zarif due in Kuwait on Saturday
- US faces humiliating defeat after Gibraltar releases Iranian tanker: Envoy
- Spokesman rejects claim on Iran’s commitment in exchange for tanker release
- Zarif reacts to release of Iranian tanker in Gibraltar
- Israel, UAE engaged in secret talks on Iran arranged by US: Report
- US threatens visa ban as Iranian-operated tanker sets to sail from Gibraltar
- Enemies must factor Iran's global power in their calculations: IRGC's chief commander
- Trump’s administration conflicting messages to Iran baffle go-betweens: Report
- Gibraltar releases Iran-operated tanker despite US pressure
TEHRAN, August 27 - Nowadays, the talk of US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran is not exclusively circulated within foreign policy and diplomatic circles
TEHRAN, Young Journalists Club (YJC) - Nowadays, the talk of US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran is not exclusively circulated within foreign policy and diplomatic circles; it’s out in the open making the rounds.
The political will on the part of all parties to the negotiations was ultimately embodied within the multilaterally negotiated Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action which significantly drew upon the success of its predecessor the Joint Plan of Action.
As attested to by influential individuals and organizations, the JCPOA is a historic deal bringing one of the most contentious proliferation crises of the first decade of the twenty first century to a satisfactory end.
The NPT has been considered as the cornerstone of the non-proliferation regime according to which the International Atomic Energy has been tasked to monitor and verify Iranian side of the bargain. The IAEA has issued six reports confirming Iranian compliance with the deal thus far.
The European Union and other relevant international organizations staunchly support the implementation of the nuclear deal, and have applauded it as a collective achievement of the international community which cannot be reduced to a mere bilateral deal between two specific parties.
The foreign ministers of Iran, the P5+1 group of countries and the European Union pose in Lausanne, Switzerland, on April 2, 2015.
From the political standpoint, the top echelon of American administration is rather packed with neophytes lacking the fundamental rationality desperately required for political leadership; and from the legal point of view American possible unilateral exit would constitute a violation of International Law and the United Nations Security Council resolution.
Even if the US opted out of the nuclear deal, she would still be obliged by International Law and the United Nations Security Council Resolution to uphold and refrain from undermining the deal.
Any perceived action in this regard is arbitrarily a legal violation which will cost the US dearly in terms of her long term interests.
From the political standpoint, the top echelon of American administration is rather packed with neophytes lacking the fundamental rationality desperately required for political leadership; and from the legal point of view American possible unilateral exit would constitute a violation of International Law and the United Nations Security Council resolution.
Even if the US opted out of the nuclear deal, she would still be obliged by International Law and the United Nations Security Council Resolution to uphold and refrain from undermining the deal.
Any perceived action in this regard is arbitrarily a legal violation which will cost the US dearly in terms of her long term interests.
All international commitments are, in principle, based on the principle "pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).
His background in business must give the US president a clear understanding that the nuclear deal is a fait accompli from which you cannot walk away under false pretexts.
The US power and relevance in international system makes the president’s actions all the more important as it could potentially lead to irreparable catastrophes.
Legally speaking unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA is not permissible. As sovereign entities countries could make legally unjustifiable decisions in contravention of international law, however, flouting the law does not connote or condone a state of lawlessness.
From a purely legal perspective, the mechanisms embedded within the JCPOA and the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 make withdrawal impossible.
The JCPOA is not merely a pact or a simple agreement, but an international system writ large. Legally speaking the JCPOA maintains a hierarchy of rules and regulations. The JCPOA contains primary and secondary legal provisions and its implementation is supported by a verification mechanism, dispute settlement, withdrawal and ultimate annulment.
Furthermore, under the UN Charter, the JCPOA has been endorsed by a Security Council Resolution. Such mechanism bears close resemblance to national administrative and legal systems.
The binding force of the JCPOA drives not only from the will of the contracting parties, but also from the Security Council Resolution 2231.
The JCPOA is endorsed as Annex A to the Security Council Resolution 2231 which, according to international law, is an integral part of the UNSC resolution. Therefore, not only the parties to the JCPOA are bound by it, but also, given the UN members’ pledge to accept and adopt the decision of the Security Council under Article 25 of the UN Charter, the Resolution 2231 is binding upon all UN Member States, which in turn, commits them to the JCPOA.
Even if the US invokes its domestic mechanisms as the reason for shirking its commitments enshrined in the JCPOA, she cannot evade its commitments under the Security Council Resolution.
The strategic loss the US would suffer by ignoring a Chapter VII UNSC resolution is beyond the ken of current US Administration. Just take a moment to appreciate the gravity of such an act; all other Security Council Members will soon follow suit in adopting an irresponsible approach and will disregard their obligations and enforcement regulations.
The file photo shows a meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif (1st R) and former US Secretary of State John Kerry (1st L) in Vienna.
The JCPOA commitments in a nutshell would be for Iran to take confidence-building and transparency measures, implement the Additional Protocol, put a cap on its enrichment level and reiterate that ‘under no circumstance’ will Iran seek nuclear weapons, and in return, the other party pledges to terminate nuclear sanctions and commit to cooperate in civil nuclear projects.
To violate any of these two sets of principles, under internal or administrative pretexts or for any other excuse, will relieve the other party of its duties under the deal.
Thus, any attempt on the part of the US to derail the JCPOA or withdraw from it and forfeit implementing obligations under the deal will, in principle, bear upon the commitments of the other party as regards transparency and confidence-building measures; this is the political ramification of breaching legal commitments.
On the other hand, if we look at the bigger picture, we could discern its integral elements; namely the text of the JCPOA and UNSC resolution, binding statements of the contracting parties upon finalization of the deal; thus, it is easy to figure out that from a legal point of view any withdrawal from the deal would be illegitimate without the consent of the Security Council.
The JCPOA invokes the national laws of each party as a basis for carrying out their commitments on a national level and cannot serve as a substitute for their international commitments, specifically those set out under a UNSC resolution.
Thus, any measure taken by all UN Member States, not just the US, aimed at undermining the JCPOA is a violation of international law and inconsistent with UNSCR 2231.
To exacerbate its already-poor JCPOA implementation record, the US seems bent on undermining the JCPOA or even withdrawing from it. Not only would this be a violation of international law, but also this would provide Iran and other parties to the deal with reasonable grounds to take countermeasures.
The Islamic Republic of Iran was one of the parties to the JCPOA, however, a Security Council endorsement of the agreement took matters beyond the negotiating parties and anointed it as an international agreement by which all members of the international community are bound.
Any unilateral counter-JCPOA measure by the US will be to the detriment of both Iran and the US and deals a devastating blow to the international community as they won’t be able to reap the economic benefits from the otherwise lucrative business with Iran.
Unilateral acts on the part of the US or any other nation, or even in inter-personal relationships for that matter, are allowed to the extent they won’t encroach on others’ rights and benefits; the transgressor must be held accountable.
In the end, US president’s inexorable hostility towards Iran and a negotiated deal, endorsed by the international community, does not jibe well with any legal or political logic.
The heart desire remains that the US Administration paid more attention to the facts on the ground than stubbornly bent on emotional and illogical reactions.
Nations and statesmen, especially those with the political inexperience of a parvenu, are prone to embark on irrational undertakings or commit strategic errors.
If the push comes to shove, however, Iran will not sit idle and will take necessary measures to rise to the challenge.
Your Comment