Pakistan envoy: Iran nuke deal would lower tensions, boost projects

Young journalists club

News ID: 6508
Iran » Iran
Publish Date: 17:51 - 04 March 2015
TEHRAN, YJC. Jilani says his country is hoping Iran would strike a deal with world powers so that his country would benefit from relations with Tehran.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was warning in his Tuesday address to Congress that Iran’s neighbors feared the potential nuclear agreement now being negotiated by the Obama administration and its international partners, at least one of those neighbors said it is rooting strongly that a deal can be struck.

A deal to curb Iran’s nuclear programs and ease economic sanctions on Tehran would be seen as "extremely positive” by Pakistan and many other countries in the region, Pakistani Ambassador to the U.S. Jalil Abbas Jilani told a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor just an hour before the Israeli leader began speaking on Capitol Hill.

Mr. Jilani said a number of bilateral projects with Iran, including a major natural gas pipeline, have had to be put on hold because of the international sanctions targeting Tehran, and could be quickly revived if the nuclear deal eases the restrictions on doing business with Tehran.

"Our region has seen a lot of tension in the last several years,” Mr. Jilani said, noting that Pakistan shares a nearly 600-mile border with Iran. "Nobody can afford many more new tensions.”

The ambassador said there were "tremendous opportunities for economic cooperation” between Iran and Pakistan, and that ending Iran’s diplomatic isolation would also "fit well with regional connectivity” linking South Asia to markets in the Middle East.

Iran and Pakistan had originally hoped to inaugurate the 1,700-mile pipeline to transport Iranian natural gas by the end of 2014, but the sanctions and pressure by the Obama administration have repeatedly led Islamabad to delay. India had originally expressed interest in receiving gas from the pipeline but dropped out in 2009 in the face of opposition from Washington.

The Washington Times

Your Comment