Tehran, YJC. Former Lawmaker has said in what he believes to be pathology of the deviant current that the current feigns hero.
A former Lawmaker and incumbent Secretary General of the Society of Devotees of the Islamic Revolution, Hosein Fadaee regards the deviant current pivoting around the present administration as set in motion by an amalgam of Western and Eastern humanist thought that tries to introduce the issue of talks with the US in the fashion of a buccaneer.
Fadaee believes the current to aim at playing the hero in political, international, and economic spheres in order to secure its power.
Regarding the odds that the current could do any harm to the country, Fadaee believed that such a thing is a daydream dreamt by the deviant current.
He further said that the current is an amalgam of different things and that "on one hand it is based on Western humanistic thought, while on the other it follows Eastern humanism. It carries a hallow of Islamism at the same time as it justifies itself by following the idea of the complete human being introduced by some great Islamic theoreticians such as Ibn Arabi.”
The former Lawmaker stated "This so-called deviant current is taken by the illusion that it would become the international protagonist in talks with the US. In the economic sphere it intends to appropriate extensive services done for the people, especially those done during the 9th and 10th administrations in its own name, while these are common services that belong to the people and the Islamic Revolution.”
Fadaee further said "They intend to impose a bipolar vibe upon the country, one of black/white, and poor/aristocrat like Latin America and Venezuela where a lot of people who are the poor stand in one side and the aristocratic, privileged on the other. To do that, they made up a lot of cases against different individuals to say whoever is not with us is against us.”
Regarding how the current appeared on the sedition, Fadaee said "In the public mind the deviant current is regarded as anti-sedition. But that is not the reality, because during the first days of the sedition in the wake of June 12, 09, they were after releasing leaders of the sedition current, having made correspondences twice. On the other side nowhere did they make clear stance against the sedition. Also there are reports that in some occasions they tried to have relationship with each other.”